Explaining Code Reviews with Clarity

Master the practice of clear, constructive code reviews.

Code reviews can either be your best friend or the kind of nightmare that makes you question all your life choices. When done right, they improve code quality, spread knowledge, and keep everyone on their toes with best practices. When done poorly, they leave you scratching your head, wondering if the reviewer even looked at your code—or just slammed their keyboard in frustration. The secret to a great code review? Communicating feedback so clearly that no one has to decode it like a cryptic crossword. Here’s how to master the art of clear, constructive code reviews so everyone leaves the review happier (and hopefully less stressed).

Why Clear Code Reviews Matter

1. Avoiding Miscommunication

Nothing makes a developer’s day like opening a code review full of comments like “This looks off” or “Needs work.” Just kidding—those comments are about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. If your feedback isn’t specific, how is the author supposed to know what to fix? Clear, actionable comments are the key to avoiding misunderstandings and making sure your team spends less time guessing and more time coding. Clear communication helps ensure your feedback gets results instead of eye-rolls.

2. Improving Team Dynamics

Code reviews aren’t just about hunting for bugs—they’re a collaboration opportunity disguised as criticism. When you deliver thoughtful, constructive feedback, you’re not just improving the code—you’re building trust. But when your comments sound like personal attacks, things can get awkward fast. Communicating feedback constructively helps create a positive environment where everyone feels comfortable contributing. After all, nobody wants to be “that developer” who makes teammates dread opening pull requests.

3. Building Shared Understanding

Good code reviews do more than squash bugs—they build a shared understanding of the codebase across the team. When you explain why a change makes sense, you’re helping teammates learn and get better. This leads to fewer “Wait, why’d we do it that way?” moments down the line. Effective communication is what keeps everyone aligned and ensures your code reviews don’t feel like an episode of Unsolved Mysteries.

Tips for Explaining Code Reviews Clearly

1. Be Specific

Saying “Needs work” is about as helpful as a fortune cookie with no fortune inside. If something needs changing, say exactly what it is and why. For example, instead of “This function is too long,” try, “This function could be split into smaller helpers to improve readability and make it easier to test.” Specific feedback gives the author a clear direction—and reduces the chances of them cursing your name under their breath.

2. Focus on the Code, Not the Person

It seems obvious, but let’s say it louder for the people in the back: you’re reviewing the code, not the person. Avoid comments like, “This is a terrible way to do it.” Even if it is a terrible way, there’s a better way to say it—like, “This could be simplified by doing X.” Using empathy in communication ensures you’re focusing on the code and keeping things constructive. No one likes to feel attacked—and let’s be real, you’re not perfect either.

3. Provide Context

Not all code decisions are black and white. If you’re suggesting a change, provide some context about why it’s better. For instance, “Using a hashmap here could improve lookup time since the dataset might grow.” This kind of explanation helps the author understand your thought process and makes it a learning moment, not just a critique.

4. Suggest Solutions

Pointing out a problem without offering a solution is like complaining about the weather—it doesn’t help anyone. If you notice an issue, suggest how to fix it. Even if your suggestion isn’t perfect, it gives the author a place to start. For example, “Consider breaking this function into smaller helpers—maybe one for each major step.” Offering solutions shows you care about improving the code, not just pointing fingers.

💡

Real-Life Scenario: You receive a code review filled with comments like, “This is wrong” or “Fix this.” Helpful, right? Nope. You’re left wondering what’s wrong, why it needs fixing, and how to fix it. Now imagine getting a review that says, “This loop could be replaced with a list comprehension for better readability” or “Consider renaming this variable to make its purpose clearer.” The difference? One makes you want to throw your laptop out the window, while the other helps you improve your code without the headache.

Conclusion

Code reviews are a vital part of software development, but they’re only as good as the feedback they provide. Be specific, focus on the code (not the person), provide context, and suggest solutions. Clear, constructive communication doesn’t just improve the codebase—it builds stronger, more collaborative teams. The goal isn’t just to get the code working—it’s to make the team better, one review at a time.